Universities and their pet projects

Everyone claims there is a financial crisis in higher education. So two recent announcements made me pause for thought. Trinity’s announcement of a one billion euro innovation campus  and UCD’s announcement of a 48 million euro  innovation and creativity centre (or something) seem somewhat incongruous. I’m surprised that no one – in the media or in politics  – has asked what the impact of these prestige projects are likely to have on the funding available for undergraduate education. I’m sure the funding arrangements are complex and I don’t know what they are, but I’d imagine some borrowing will be involved. And loans have to be paid off.

Whenever I chat to colleagues about issues like this, they often express frustration that funding can always be found for pet projects but never for the nuts and bolts of undergraduate teaching. They might be right.

3 thoughts on “Universities and their pet projects

    1. Not in my experience. Much of the investment in, say, research centres and research equipment has little or no impact on undergraduate education and, in the long term, maintenance costs can be a significant drain on resources.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. There is much to be said for “transparent accounting” in higher education. There is nothing wrong in principle with cross-subsidies but these should be clear for everyone to see. It is generally agreed that undergraduate education subsidises research but it would be interesting to see reliable figures for this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s